SA’s developing solar energy landscape explained

Until a few years ago solar panels were a rare sight in South Africa, largely limited to the roofs of a few affluent households. This is changing rapidly, driven by three factors: the worldwide drive towards renewable energy, a highly strained local electricity supply, and a steady drop in solar panel prices.

Taking the lead from other countries, South Africa committed to an energy generation infrastructure development plan for 2010 to 2030, known as the Integrated Resource Plan.

Under the plan the country aims to achieve 9 600 MW of solar power capacity by 2030. When the plan was drawn up in 2010, solar was limited to a few isolated panels on domestic rooftops, and until recently contributed nothing to the national power grid operated by the state-owned utility Eskom.

But that is changing.

Solar plants are being developed, most by the private sector under a specially designed procurement program. Eskom is also constructing some facilities.

Much easier, much cheaper

In the last ten years the defining development in solar energy has been the sharp drop in the prices of photovoltaic panels. There has also been modest technological advances in other solar technologies and in power storage.

 

Photovoltaics, or PV, is a process in which energy from light is absorbed in materials and then directly transferred to electrons, resulting in an electric current. Research advances over the years, especially those involving easily available silicon-based materials, have made this an increasingly cheap solar technology. It is also now the most popular.

The simplest PV configuration has immobile solar panels, slightly tilted relative to the ground and facing northwards towards the midday sun. An example is the Droogfontein Plant near Kimberley in South Africa’s Northern Cape province. Panel rows are placed in a way to ensure that each panel does not shade the one behind it.

A more sophisticated design, found at the Sishen Plant near Kathu, also in the Northern Cape, uses a single axis-tracking technology to counteract efficiency losses. Each row of panels steadily rotates along a north-south axis with the sun until it reaches a point where it starts to shade the row behind it.

In two-axis tracking systems, panels constantly face the sun squarely. The Herbert and Greefspan plants near Douglas in the Northern Cape use this technology. The cost of the additional tracking motors is compensated for by the capture of more sunlight.

Concentrated solar power

Concentrated solar power, or CSP, technologies are based on the redirecting of sunlight, normally by mirrors, to a common focal point, which as a result becomes extremely hot.

This heat is transferred by fluids to a nearby electricity generating unit, where water is boiled to drive a turbine. This is similar to the process in coal power stations where coal is burnt to generate heat.

CSP technologies include the solar tower, where a multitude of mirrors continually realign themselves to reflect sunlight to a hot spot on the tower. Khi Solar 1, under construction near Upington, is a representative of this class.

The parabolic trough technology requires long rows of concave mirrors focusing sunlight onto pipes running just above. The already operational KaXu near Pofadder uses this technology, and similar plants in Bokpoort and XiNa will be added soon. A related technology, linear Fresnel, appears in some of the proposals for future South African solar plants.


The KaXu plant is using parabolic trough technology. (Power technology)

Finally, there is a hybrid technology, concentrated photovoltaics, where the collecting focal point contains a PV receiver rather than a heatable fluid. This design was used for the Touws River solar plant in the Western Cape province.

The pros and hidden cons

Solar energy almost completely avoids emissions, uses a limitless energy resource and is becoming increasingly inexpensive. As such it is promoted as a major clean contributor to solving the world’s energy crisis.

At the same time, it is important to recognise the shortcomings of solar power. Solar energy generation is only possible during daytime and in reasonably cloud-free conditions. In South Africa that corresponds to typically eight hours per day on average.

For PV, the poorer the alignment between the sun and a solar panel, the worse the efficiency. Dust build-up on a panel further blocks sunlight, and photovoltaic panels don’t function properly if even only a fraction of the surface is shaded.

The quoted power produced by a panel or a solar plant is mostly obtained under near-optimal solar exposure. And the daily average power generated is much lower.

Energy storage also remains a challenge. Despite this, solar energy remains an attractive option.

All the completed solar power plants are part of South Africa’s electricity supply as they are fully linked to Eskom’s grid. Solar power already feeds more than 1 MW onto the grid on a sunny day. This is a significant amount, and it makes it considerably less likely that the country will suffer power cuts in 2016.

Hartmut Winkler, Professor of Physics, University of Johannesburg

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

SA is suffering because of Eskom

09 December 2016, 15:44

Let’s take a look at South Africa’s potential for renewable energy.We have some of the best sunshine in the world. We also have a long, long coastline, which means we have a lot of wind power. Yet we are hardly touching the potential of renewable energy – indeed, Eskom is actively working against it.By comparison, Germany, Europe’s biggest economy, already gets over 25% of its electricity from renewables, and is aiming for 80% by 2050.

Portugal – with a coastline similar to ours – already generated more than 70% of its electricity from renewable sources in 2013, yet we in SA are generating only a tiny percent of our energy via renewables. Why?

The answer lies in the greed of the ANC and Eskom. Eskom wants to profit from its sale of electricity. And it wants to put in totally unnecessary nuclear power costing a trillion rands, so that connected ANC cadres can rip off billions in bribes.

So they are denying ordinary South Africans the right to electricity at far lower cost in future. Our reputable CSIR has already scientifically worked out that renewables provide electrical energy at a far lower cost than either coal or nuclear.

We are already using less electricity now than we did in 2013, thanks to the ANC wrecking business with ‘loadshedding’, and preventing new businesses being established in SA. When Medupi, Kusile and Ingula come on full stream (dozens of billions over budget), we will have more than enough electricity for the next 30 years at least – if we encourage renwable power.

We have the sunshine – some of the best in the world. We have the wind. But greedy Eskom is the dog in the manger wanting to control all our futures and our pockets.

It’s time this monopoly was taken down, for the sake of all South Africans.